On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 06:55:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is more generic and simpler validation just against the nregs. > Using it allows to drop customization from the intel_get_padcfg(). > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Simplify offset validation in intel_get_padcfg()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Simplify offset validation in intel_get_padcfg()
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:16:20 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20190723155514.65177-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20190723155514.65177-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
- References:
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Simplify offset validation in intel_get_padcfg()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Simplify offset validation in intel_get_padcfg()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Use NSEC_PER_USEC for debounce calculus
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: broxton: Provide Interrupt Status register offset
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Simplify offset validation in intel_get_padcfg()
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/8] pinctrl: broxton: Provide Interrupt Status register offset
- Index(es):
 |