Re: [PATCH V6 01/21] irqchip: tegra: Do not disable COP IRQ during suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:33:48PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:05:13PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > 25.07.2019 12:55, Peter De Schrijver пишет:
> > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:54:51PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > >>
> > >> All Tegra SoCs support SC7, hence the 'supports_sc7' and the comment
> > >> doesn't sound correct to me. Something like 'firmware_sc7' should suit
> > >> better here.
> > >>
> > >>> +			writel_relaxed(~0ul, ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IER_CLR);
> > >>
> > >> Secondly, I'm also not sure why COP interrupts need to be disabled for
> > >> pre-T210 at all, since COP is unused. This looks to me like it was
> > >> cut-n-pasted from downstream kernel without a good reason and could be
> > >> simply removed.
> > > 
> > > I don't think we can rely on the fact that COP is unused. People can
> > > write their own code to run on COP.
> > 
> > 1. Not upstream - doesn't matter.
> > 
> 
> The code is not part of the kernel, so obviously it's not upstream?
> 
> > 2. That's not very good if something unknown is running on COP and then
> > kernel suddenly intervenes, don't you think so?
> 
> Unless the code was written with this in mind.
> 

Looking at this again, I don't think we need to enable the IRQ at all.

Peter.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux