23.07.2019 3:58, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 21.07.2019 22:40, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет: >> This patch implements PMC wakeup sequence for Tegra210 and defines >> common used RTC alarm wake event. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> index 91c84d0e66ae..c556f38874e1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c >> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ >> #define PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_OE BIT(11) /* system clock enable */ >> #define PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_POLARITY BIT(10) /* sys clk polarity */ >> #define PMC_CNTRL_MAIN_RST BIT(4) >> +#define PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS BIT(5) Please follow the TRM's bits naming. PMC_CNTRL_LATCHWAKE_EN >> +#define PMC_WAKE_MASK 0x0c >> +#define PMC_WAKE_LEVEL 0x10 >> +#define PMC_WAKE_STATUS 0x14 >> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS 0x18 >> >> #define DPD_SAMPLE 0x020 >> #define DPD_SAMPLE_ENABLE BIT(0) >> @@ -87,6 +93,11 @@ >> >> #define PMC_SCRATCH41 0x140 >> >> +#define PMC_WAKE2_MASK 0x160 >> +#define PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL 0x164 >> +#define PMC_WAKE2_STATUS 0x168 >> +#define PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS 0x16c >> + >> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL 0x1b0 >> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_SCRATCH_WRITE BIT(2) >> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_ENABLE_RST BIT(1) >> @@ -1922,6 +1933,55 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = { >> .alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc, >> }; >> >> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on) >> +{ >> + struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); >> + unsigned int offset, bit; >> + u32 value; >> + >> + if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX) >> + return 0; >> + >> + offset = data->hwirq / 32; >> + bit = data->hwirq % 32; >> + >> + /* >> + * Latch wakeups to SW_WAKE_STATUS register to capture events >> + * that would not make it into wakeup event register during LP0 exit. >> + */ >> + value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL); >> + value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS; >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL); >> + udelay(120); > > Why it takes so much time to latch the values? Shouldn't some status-bit > be polled for the completion of latching? > > Is this register-write really getting buffered in the PMC? > >> + value &= ~PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS; >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL); >> + udelay(120); > > 120 usecs to remove latching, really? > >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE_STATUS); >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS); >> + >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE_STATUS); >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, 0, PMC_WAKE2_STATUS); >> + >> + /* enable PMC wake */ >> + if (data->hwirq >= 32) >> + offset = PMC_WAKE2_MASK; >> + else >> + offset = PMC_WAKE_MASK; >> + >> + value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset); >> + >> + if (on) >> + value |= 1 << bit; >> + else >> + value &= ~(1 << bit); >> + >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset); > > Why the latching is done *before* writing into the WAKE registers? What > it is latching then? I'm looking at the TRM doc and it says that latching should be done *after* writing to the WAKE_MASK / LEVEL registers. Secondly it says that it's enough to do: value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL); value |= PMC_CNTRL_LATCH_WAKEUPS; tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL); in order to latch. There is no need for the delay and to remove the "LATCHWAKE_EN" bit, it should be a oneshot action. >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on) >> { >> struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); >> @@ -1954,6 +2014,49 @@ static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type) >> +{ >> + struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); >> + unsigned int offset, bit; >> + u32 value; >> + >> + if (data->hwirq == ULONG_MAX) >> + return 0; >> + >> + offset = data->hwirq / 32; >> + bit = data->hwirq % 32; >> + >> + if (data->hwirq >= 32) >> + offset = PMC_WAKE2_LEVEL; >> + else >> + offset = PMC_WAKE_LEVEL; >> + >> + value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset); >> + >> + switch (type) { >> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING: >> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH: >> + value |= 1 << bit; >> + break; >> + >> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING: >> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW: >> + value &= ~(1 << bit); >> + break; >> + >> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING: >> + value ^= 1 << bit; >> + break; >> + >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, offset); > > Shouldn't the WAKE_LEVEL be latched as well? > >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type) >> { >> struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); >> @@ -2540,6 +2643,10 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc tegra210_pin_descs[] = { >> TEGRA210_IO_PAD_TABLE(TEGRA_IO_PIN_DESC) >> }; >> >> +static const struct tegra_wake_event tegra210_wake_events[] = { >> + TEGRA_WAKE_IRQ("rtc", 16, 2), >> +}; >> + >> static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = { >> .num_powergates = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_powergates), >> .powergates = tegra210_powergates, >> @@ -2557,10 +2664,14 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = { >> .regs = &tegra20_pmc_regs, >> .init = tegra20_pmc_init, >> .setup_irq_polarity = tegra20_pmc_setup_irq_polarity, >> + .irq_set_wake = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_wake, >> + .irq_set_type = tegra210_pmc_irq_set_type, >> .reset_sources = tegra210_reset_sources, >> .num_reset_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_reset_sources), >> .reset_levels = NULL, >> .num_reset_levels = 0, >> + .num_wake_events = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra210_wake_events), >> + .wake_events = tegra210_wake_events, >> }; >> >> #define TEGRA186_IO_PAD_TABLE(_pad) \ >> >