wt., 16 lip 2019 o 23:46 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:20 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > wt., 9 lip 2019 o 15:30 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > I was thinking something like this in the stubs: > > > > > > gpiod_get[_index]() { > > > return POISON; > > > } > > > > > > gpiod_get[_index]_optional() { > > > return NULL; > > > } > > > > This is already being done. > > Ah it is. > > > > This way all gpiod_get() and optional calls are properly > > > handled and the semantic that only _optional calls > > > can return NULL is preserved. (Your patch would > > > violate this.) > > > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't quite see how my patch > > violates this behavior. :( > > I missed that we actually do pass a poison from the strict > *get functions, mea culpa. > > Let's apply this, will you send me a pull request or shall I > just try to apply it? > > Yours, > Linus Walleij I'll apply it to my local tree and send it for v5.3-rc2. Bart