On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:38 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct > spinlock". > > Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition. > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied with Bartosz' ACK! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 20:15:14 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20190704153803.12739-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
- References: <20190704153803.12739-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20190704153803.12739-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
- References:
- [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
- [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] gpio: gpiolib-of.c: Add of_node_put() before break
- Next by Date: [gpio:devel-gpio-driver-isolation 61/66] arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c:306:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'desc_to_gpio'; did you mean 'dev_to_psd'?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix incorrect IRQ requesting of an active-low lineevent
- Index(es):
 |