On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 04:02:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is no need to duplicate the check which is done in the common > intel_pinctrl_probe(). > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:13:21 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20190704130239.24111-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20190704130239.24111-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- Next by Date: [PATCH 7/7] gpiolib: Use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: Drop double check for data in intel_pinctrl_probe_by_uid()
- Index(es):
 |