On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A new field init_valid_mask was added to struct gpio_chip, but it was
> not documented.
>
> Fixes: f8ec92a9f63b3b11 ("gpiolib: Add init_valid_mask exported function")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Document new gpio_chip.init_valid_mask field
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Document new gpio_chip.init_valid_mask field
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:34:29 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20190701142650.25122-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
- References: <20190701142650.25122-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpiolib: Document new gpio_chip.init_valid_mask field
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH] gpiolib: Document new gpio_chip.init_valid_mask field
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: Fix reference to gpiod_get_array()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix references to gpiod_[gs]et_*value_cansleep() variants
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: Document new gpio_chip.init_valid_mask field
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix references to gpiod_[gs]et_*value_cansleep() variants
- Index(es):
 |