On Wed 03 Jul 2019 at 13:51, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/07/2019 01:54, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> Hi Neil, >> [...] >> does it make sense to name this file "meson-g12a-g12b-sm1-common.dtsi" instead? >> do you know whether there will be a successor to G12B and what it's >> code-name will be? > > meson-g12a-g12b-sm1-common seems a bit long to me... +1 ... and what if the generation after that is compatible as well ? We extend the name again ? Such naming scheme does not scale. meson-g12-common.dtsi looks good to me. IMO, The fact the sm1 dtsi includes the file is enough to understand that sm1 derive from the g12a/b > > We don't have naming of the future SoCs, since SM1 is only available on > prototypes yet. > > Neil > >> >> >> Martin >>