Re: [PATCH 5/8] pinctrl: aspeed: Correct comment that is no longer true

[Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 07:16, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have handled the GFX register case for quite some time now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h
> index 4b06ddbc6aec..c5918c4a087c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h
> @@ -240,8 +240,7 @@
>   * opposed to naming them e.g. PINMUX_CTRL_[0-9]). Further, signal expressions
>   * reference registers beyond those dedicated to pinmux, such as the system
>   * reset control and MAC clock configuration registers. The AST2500 goes a step

AST2600 too?

Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>

> - * further and references registers in the graphics IP block, but that isn't
> - * handled yet.
> + * further and references registers in the graphics IP block.
>   */
>  #define SCU2C           0x2C /* Misc. Control Register */
>  #define SCU3C           0x3C /* System Reset Control/Status Register */
> --
> 2.20.1
>