Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:35 AM Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Introduce the irq_enable callback which will be same as irq_unmask
> except that it will also clear the status bit before unmask.
>
> This will help in clearing any erroneous interrupts that would
> have got latched when the interrupt is not in use.
>
> There may be devices like UART which can use the same gpio line
> for data rx as well as a wakeup gpio when in suspend. The data that
> was flowing on the line may latch the interrupt and when we enable
> the interrupt before going to suspend, this would trigger the
> unexpected interrupt. This change helps clearing the interrupt
> so that these unexpected interrupts gets cleared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Overall this looks good to me, waiting for Bjorn's review.

> Changes since v1:
> - Extracted common code into __msm_gpio_irq_unmask().

Please don't name functions __like __that.

> -static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +static void __msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear)

Instead of __unclear __underscore __semantic use something
really descriptive like

static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_irq()

That is what it does, right?

Other than that it looks fine.

Yours,
Linus Walleij