Re: [PATCH V4 13/18] soc/tegra: pmc: allow support for more tegra wake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/24/19 1:15 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:02:54 +0100,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch allows to create separate irq_set_wake and irq_set_type
implementations for different tegra designs PMC that has different
wake models which require difference wake registers and different
programming sequence.

AOWAKE model support is available for Tegra186 and Tegra194 only
and it resides within PMC and supports tiered wake architecture.

Tegra210 and prior tegra designs uses PMC directly to receive wake
events and coordinate the wake sequence.

Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
index edd4fe06810f..e87f29a35fcf 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
  	void (*setup_irq_polarity)(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
  				   struct device_node *np,
  				   bool invert);
+	int (*irq_set_wake)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on);
+	int (*irq_set_type)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type);
const char * const *reset_sources;
  	unsigned int num_reset_sources;
@@ -1919,7 +1921,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = {
  	.alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc,
  };
-static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
+static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
  {
  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
  	unsigned int offset, bit;
@@ -1951,7 +1953,7 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
  	return 0;
  }
-static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
  {
  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
  	u32 value;
@@ -2005,8 +2007,10 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc)
  	pmc->irq.irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent;
  	pmc->irq.irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent;
  	pmc->irq.irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
-	pmc->irq.irq_set_type = tegra_pmc_irq_set_type;
-	pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake;
+	if (pmc->soc->irq_set_type)
+		pmc->irq.irq_set_type = pmc->soc->irq_set_type;
+	if (pmc->soc->irq_set_wake)
+		pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = pmc->soc->irq_set_wake;
I already commented on how superfluous these 'if ()' where. If you
disagree, please let me know why.

Thanks,

	M.

Sorry Marc, missed it. Will fix in next version...


Thanks

Sowjanya




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux