On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:52 AM Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The gpio interrupt status bit is getting set after the > irq is disabled and causing an immediate interrupt after > enablling the irq, so clear status bit on irq_unmask. > > Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <tengfeif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This looks pretty serious, can one of the Qcom maintainers ACK this? Should it be sent to fixes and even stable? Fixes: tag? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 23:08:10 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1559285512-27784-1-git-send-email-tengfeif@codeaurora.org>
- References: <1559285512-27784-1-git-send-email-tengfeif@codeaurora.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- From: Stephen Boyd
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- From: Tengfei Fan
- [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ns2: Fix potential NULL dereference
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document drive strength settings for BM1880 SoC
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear status bit on irq_unmask
- Index(es):
 |