On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:36 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> a single GPIO fix for v5.2.
Hmm. This didn't get a pr-tracker-bot response because apparently you
only sent it to the gpio list and it's not tracked by the pull bot..
Maybe gpio should be added to the lore-tracked lists? Or you need to
just keep cc'ing lkml too, like you did for pincontrol..
Linus
Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 09:59:55 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CACRpkdasSjtspciHijdc4mQyNvQVSgYMgsZKaSn+ZSvsev6t0g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CACRpkdasSjtspciHijdc4mQyNvQVSgYMgsZKaSn+ZSvsev6t0g@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- References:
- [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- From: Linus Walleij
- [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for v5.2
- Next by Date: [PATCH V2 00/12] LP0 entry and exit support for Tegra210
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO fixes for v5.2
- Index(es):
 |