On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:00 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There will be a conflict due to a patch for Intel pin control landed in the > devel pin control queue. Though, it applies cleanly on top of for-next. > > I would recommend to drop Intel specific patches from devel queue. OK I dropped Chris Chiu's patch from my queue and pulled this in instead. Sorry for picking that up by mistake. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.2-1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.2-1
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 07:54:46 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20190429100007.GA69386@black.fi.intel.com>
- References: <20190429100007.GA69386@black.fi.intel.com>
- References:
- [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.2-1
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.2-1
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v14 7/8] power: supply: Initial support for ROHM BD70528 PMIC charger block
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Run-time debug code fixes and enhancements
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.2-1
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/4] synquacer: implement ACPI gpio/interrupt support
- Index(es):
 |