On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:48 PM Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 11:25 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > pinctrl variants that include pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h (and not > > pinctrl-mtk-common.h) also need to use mtk_eint_pm_ops to setup > > wake mask properly, so copy over the pm_ops to v2. > > > > It is not easy to merge the 2 copies (or move > > mtk_eint_suspend/resume to mtk-eint.c), as we need to > > dereference pctrl->eint, and struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl has a > > different structure definition for v1 and v2. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Chuanjia Liu <Chuanjia.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > index 20e1c890e73b30c..7e19b5a4748eafe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > @@ -723,3 +723,22 @@ int mtk_pinconf_adv_drive_get(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, > > > > return 0; > > } > > + > > +static int mtk_eint_suspend(struct device *device) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(device); > > + > > + return mtk_eint_do_suspend(pctl->eint); > > +} > > + > > +static int mtk_eint_resume(struct device *device) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(device); > > + > > + return mtk_eint_do_resume(pctl->eint); > > +} > > + > > +const struct dev_pm_ops mtk_eint_pm_ops = { > > + .suspend_noirq = mtk_eint_suspend, > > + .resume_noirq = mtk_eint_resume, > > +}; > > This is identical to the one in pinctrl-mtk-common.c and will have name > clash if both pinctrl-mtk-common.c and pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c are > built. > > It would be better if we try to merge both version into mtk-eint.c, this > way we could also remove some global functions. Argh, I didn't think about the name clash, you're right. I guess the easy way is to rename this one mtk_eint_pm_ops_v2 ... As highlighted in the commit message, it's tricky to merge the 2 sets of functions, they look identical, but they actually work on struct mtk_pinctrl that are defined differently (in pinctrl-mtk-common[-v2].h), so the ->eint member is at different addresses... I don't really see a way around this... Unless we want to change platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl); to pass another type of structure that could be shared (but I think that'll make the code fairly verbose, with another layer of indirection). Or just assign struct mtk_eint to that, since that contains pctl so we could get back the struct mtk_pinctrl from that, but that feels ugly as well... > > Joe.C > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek