On 2/18/19 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 8:00 AM <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reword the binding document to make it clear how the propeties work >> and which properties affect which other properties. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Harald Geyer <harald@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- >> Note: The recent gpio-regulator rework caused breakage. While the >> changes in the gpio-regulator code were according to the DT >> binding document, they stopped working with older DTs. Make >> the binding document clearer to prevent such breakage in the >> future. > > Thanks, adding more worms to the can, below... > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/gpio-regulator.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/gpio-regulator.txt >> @@ -4,16 +4,25 @@ Required properties: >> - compatible : Must be "regulator-gpio". >> - regulator-name : Defined in regulator.txt as optional, but required >> here. >> -- states : Selection of available voltages and GPIO configs. >> - if there are no states, then use a fixed regulator >> +- states : Selection of available voltages/currents provided by >> + this regulator and matching GPIO configurations to >> + achieve them. If there are no states in the "states" >> + array, use a fixed regulator instead. >> >> Optional properties: >> -- enable-gpio : GPIO to use to enable/disable the regulator. >> -- gpios : GPIO group used to control voltage. >> -- gpios-states : gpios pin's initial states array. 0: LOW, 1: HIGH. >> - defualt is LOW if nothing is specified. >> +- enable-gpio : GPIO used to enable/disable the regulator. > > According to modern GPIO rules, that should be "enable-gpios" (plural) ... Isn't that changing the ABI spec then ? >> + Warning, the GPIO phandle flags are ignored and the >> + GPIO polarity is controlled solely by the presence >> + of "enable-active-high" DT property. This is due to >> + compatibility with old DTs. > > Wasn't the purpose of the various *active-* flags to accommodate GPIOs > lacking a flags cell (i.e. typically #gpio-cells = <1>)? Yes > When the flags cell is present, there's indeed opportunity for confusion > (and breakage), combined with the presence/lack of *active-* below... The code is rather clear that the flags cell is ignored. drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c: 91 /* 92 * The regulator GPIO handles are specified such that the 93 * presence or absence of "enable-active-high" solely controls 94 * the polarity of the GPIO line. Any phandle flags must 95 * be actively ignored. 96 */ >> +- enable-active-high : Polarity of "enable-gpio" GPIO is active HIGH. >> + Default is active LOW. >> +- gpios : Array of one or more GPIO pins used to select the >> + regulator voltage/current listed in "states". >> +- gpios-states : Initial state of GPIO pins in "gpios" array. >> + 0: LOW, 1: HIGH. >> + Default is LOW if nothing else is specified. >> - startup-delay-us : Startup time in microseconds. >> -- enable-active-high : Polarity of GPIO is active high (default is low). >> - regulator-type : Specifies what is being regulated, must be either >> "voltage" or "current", defaults to voltage. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut