Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] gpio: Initial support for ROHM bd70528 GPIO block

[Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Linus,

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:29:01AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Thanks a bunch Linus,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:34 PM Matti Vaittinen
> > <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Just spotted this:
> > 
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > 
> > A driver should only need <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > the <linux/gpio.h> should not be used at all in new code,
> > it is a legacy header.
> 
> Allright. I'll do v10 and drop the header. Thanks for pointing this out

It seems to me the GPIOF_DIR_XXX are defined in linux/gpio.h. It would
be nice to refer to these flags when interpreting the return value
from the bd70528_get_direction (used in bd70528_gpio_get) - and actually
it might be nice to use those as a return value from bd70528_get_direction.

But I'll go with raw values for now and leave possible definition
moving/header refactoring to you who know the direction of code better :)

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes.  Just then, he vanished ~~~