On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:36 PM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 14:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:23 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > This patchset fixes the initial pinctrl support added for th g12a SoC > > > family, which is mainly around the register regions claimed by the > > > driver. > > > > > > Linus, would it possible for you to provide a tag with these changes to > > > Kevin ? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-meson-fixes > > > > > ATM, we can only use the devices for which the pinmux is already set by > > > the bootloader. Enabling the broken pinctrl driver could cause regressions > > > in kernelCI. Having a tag, would allow us to start using pinctrl on this > > > SoC in this cycle, w/o regression. It would be nice :) > > > > When you say "this cycle" do you mean I should target fixes (v5.0-rcN) > > or next (v5.1) with these patches? > > I was referring to the 5.1 release but it is a good question, I did not really > think about 5.0. > > Those changes are mainly fixes, so guess it could go in the 5.0 but support > for this SoC is still in its early stages, so either way is fine by me. > > Whatever is simpler for you I guess ;) I already merged it for devel and other stuff on top so it will be for v5.1 as it looks now. Yours, Linus Walleij