On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:55 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote: > AFAICS from the i.MX50 Reference Manual, the i.MX50 IOMUXC works the > same as the one in i.MX51, so I copied fsl,imx51-pinctrl.txt and changed > the text to imx50. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> i.MX people. can you please look at this patch? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:35:56 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20190129165530.7606-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
- References: <20190129165530.7606-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
- References:
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
- From: Jonathan Neuschäfer
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHv2] gpio: MT7621: use a per instance irq_chip structure
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: drop a few unneeded irq_{request,release}_resources implementations
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document the i.MX50 IOMUXC binding
- Index(es):
 |