Hi Bart, happy to resend, but could you confirm that https://patchwork-freedesktop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html is a reasonable place to read about how to send a patch that patchwork can digest? It's been a very long time since I've submitted a patch to a mailing list, and don't want to waste anybody's time, including my own. Michael On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:04 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > śr., 28 lis 2018 o 01:35 Michael Beach <michaelb@xxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > Hi all, when trying to build libgpiod with clang 6.0 and libc++ I was > > running into a problem with bitset_cmp in line_bulk.cpp. Clang was > > complaining that the operator () defined by bitset_cmp was non-const. > > Although some readings of the C++ standard allow this, it was a bit of > > a grey area and generally considered to be undesirable, and has since > > been fixed in C++17 (it is now required to be const) -- see > > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2542. > > The following patch resolves the problem... > > > > diff --git a/bindings/cxx/line_bulk.cpp b/bindings/cxx/line_bulk.cpp > > index c93f364..e52d33d 100644 > > --- a/bindings/cxx/line_bulk.cpp > > +++ b/bindings/cxx/line_bulk.cpp > > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ const ::std::map<int, int> reqtype_mapping = { > > > > struct bitset_cmp > > { > > - bool operator()(const ::std::bitset<32>& lhs, const > > ::std::bitset<32>& rhs) > > + bool operator()(const ::std::bitset<32>& lhs, const > > ::std::bitset<32>& rhs) const > > { > > return lhs.to_ulong() < rhs.to_ulong(); > > } > > Hi Michael, > > please resend this with [PATCH][libgpiod] tags. I use patchwork and it > didn't pick this one up. > > Bart