Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip

[Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:13:45 +0000,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:43 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch series adds hierarchical IRQ chip support to spmi-gpio so
> > that device tree consumers can request an IRQ directly from the GPIO
> > block rather than having to request an IRQ from the underlying PMIC.
> >
> > For more background information, see the email thread with Linus
> > Walleij's excellent description of the problem at
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg34655.html.
> >
> > This work was tested on a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone. My status page
> > at https://masneyb.github.io/nexus-5-upstream/ describes what is working
> > so far with the upstream kernel.
> >
> > Changes since v5:
> > - Patch 4: Set handler to edge or level when the IRQ is mapped.
> > - Patch 7: Change IRQ_TYPE_NONE to IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > - Patch 14: New patch to validate type when mapping IRQ
> 
> If Marc Z is happy I think I will apply all patches on an immutable branch in

As a matter of fact, I am!

> the pin control tree, so that ARM SoC and GPIO can pull it in later if need
> be. (E.g. if they get conflicts.)
> 
> I was thinking to also include the DTS changes as it all is so neatly
> coupled, then offer the branch to ARM SoC.
> 
> Anyone against?

No objection from me whatsoever.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.