Hi,
On 07-01-19 16:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 09:55:21PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
__acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags purpose is to make the gpiod_flags used
when requesting a GPIO match the restrictions from the ACPI resource,
as stored in acpi_gpio_info.flags.
But acpi_gpio_info.flags only contains direction info, and the
requester may have passed in special non-direction flags like
GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE, which we currently clobber.
This commit modifies __acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags to preserve these
special flags, so that a requested of an ACPI GPIO can e.g. pass
GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIV and have it work as intended.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
-Fold 2 statements into 1 as suggested by Andy
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 091a3784720d..800fb0901283 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio)
static int
__acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(enum gpiod_flags *flags, enum gpiod_flags update)
{
+ const enum gpiod_flags mask =
+ GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_SET | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_OUT |
+ GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_VAL;
I'm just wondering if we can introduce in consumer.h something like
#define GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
and use it here.
That seems like more of a question for Linus then for me ...
My 2 cents: I'm not sure if there are other users needing this. Also we
will still need the mask helper const to keep things within 80 chars
(or split things into 2 lines again).
Note the ASoC changes which need this to work properly have landed in -next:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git/commit/?id=0d3e91da0750835cfd5c16487ffb3cdd752ea53a
See the chunk which applies starting at line 323 for a longish
comment explaining the firmware brokenness which causes the
need to use the GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag with an ACPI gpio.
Given this and that people seem to be ok with this gpiolib-acpi patch
as is, can we maybe merge v2 and then do a possible conversion to
GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_MASK later?
Regards,
Hans
int ret = 0;
/*
@@ -489,7 +492,7 @@ __acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(enum gpiod_flags *flags, enum gpiod_flags update)
if (((*flags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_SET) && (diff & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_OUT)) ||
((*flags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_OUT) && (diff & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_VAL)))
ret = -EINVAL;
- *flags = update;
+ *flags = (*flags & ~mask) | (update & mask);
}
return ret;
}
--
2.19.1