Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Fix MOD_SEL bit numbering

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Shimoda-san,

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> MOD_SEL register bit numbering was different from R-Car E3 SoC and
> R-Car H3/M3-[WN] SoCs.
>
> MOD_SEL 1-bit      H3/M3-[WN]  E3
> ===============    ==========  =====
> Set Value = H'0    b'0         b'0
> Set Value = H'1    b'1         b'1
>
> MOD_SEL 2-bits     H3/M3-[WN]  E3
> ===============    ==========  =====
> Set Value = H'0    b'00        b'00
> Set Value = H'1    b'01        b'10
> Set Value = H'2    b'10        b'01
> Set Value = H'3    b'11        b'11
>
> MOD_SEL 3-bits     H3/M3-[WN]  E3
> ===============    ==========  =====
> Set Value = H'0    b'000       b'000
> Set Value = H'1    b'001       b'100
> Set Value = H'2    b'010       b'010
> Set Value = H'3    b'011       b'110
> Set Value = H'4    b'100       b'001
> Set Value = H'5    b'101       b'101
> Set Value = H'6    b'110       b'011
> Set Value = H'7    b'111       b'111
>
> This patch replaces the #define name and value of MOD_SEL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 6d4036a1e3b3 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Initial R8A77990 PFC support")
> [shimoda: split a patch per SoC and revise the commit log]
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, this fixes HSCIF4(B) RX.

> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77990.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77990.c
> @@ -392,28 +392,28 @@
>  FM(IP12_31_28) IP12_31_28      FM(IP13_31_28)  IP13_31_28      FM(IP14_31_28)  IP14_31_28      FM(IP15_31_28)  IP15_31_28
>
>  /* MOD_SEL0 */                 /* 0 */                         /* 1 */                         /* 2 */                         /* 3 */                 /* 4 */                 /* 5 */         /* 6 */         /* 7 */
> -#define MOD_SEL0_30_29         FM(SEL_ADGB_0)                  FM(SEL_ADGB_1)                  FM(SEL_ADGB_2)                  F_(0, 0)
> +#define MOD_SEL0_30_29         FM(SEL_ADGB_0)                  FM(SEL_ADGB_2)                  FM(SEL_ADGB_1)                  F_(0, 0)

As this is not a plain reversal, but reordering based on the reverse of
the binary value, I think this would be easier to read if you would use
a macro to do the reordering.

I sent a patch showing what I had in mind.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds