Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add AXP803 ADC bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:47:50 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 6:22 PM Jonathan Cameron
> <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:29:59 +0800
> > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:10 PM Quentin Schulz
> > > <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 03:40:11PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:56:33 -0500
> > > > > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >  
> > > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:53:23 +0300, Oskari Lemmela wrote:  
> > > > > > > The AXP803 ADC is compatible with AXP813 ADC, but add
> > > > > > > specific compatible for it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oskari Lemmela <oskari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.txt | 2 ++
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>  
> > > > >
> > > > > This doesn't seem to have any dependencies with the other patches
> > > > > so applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
> > > > > for the autobuilders to ignore.  However I am a little curious to know
> > > > > why we would add the ID and then not use it (that I can see)?
> > > > >  
> > > >
> > > > Sometimes with Allwinner (and X-Powers), two IPs seem identical until we
> > > > discover something that is slightly different. When this happens, we
> > > > have to add a compatible to differentiate both. However, we would also
> > > > need to change the Device Tree to change the compatible. We would need
> > > > to handle the driver behaviour for both Device Trees.
> > > >
> > > > So better anticipate a possible difference so that we don't have to do
> > > > some hacks in the driver to handle the device correctly.
> > > >
> > > > As always, Chen-Yu or Maxime may know better so I'm just stating what I
> > > > seem to recall.  
> > >
> > > With Allwinner stuff (X-Powers included), sometimes the documents are
> > > incomplete or have errors. We tend to add a model-specific compatible
> > > just in case things turn out not to be so compatible, unless someone
> > > has triple-checked everything, documents and actual hardware included.
> > >
> > > However we don't actually document these, so this patch isn't strictly
> > > needed. (I suppose this might annoy the device tree binding maintainers.)
> > >
> > > ChenYu  
> > I don't think it does any harm so I'll leave it in place.  Thanks for
> > the explanations.  
> 
> It might cause a bit of confusion though. We are not targetting these
> compatibles in terms of driver support, and they should not be used
> individually. IMO dropping this patch altogether is better. In the
> device tree we would use the tuplet axp803 + axp813.
> 
OK. Dropped.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ChenYu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux