pt., 9 lis 2018 o 12:54 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > Hello Bartosz, > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:13:44PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > czw., 8 lis 2018 o 21:35 Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:52:53PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > Commit 3edfb7bd76bd ("gpiolib: Show correct direction from the > > > > beginning") fixed an existing issue but broke libgpiod tests by > > > > changing the default direction of dummy lines to output. > > > > > > The indicated commit only changed what was shown in debugfs, but didn't > > > touch the actual direction of a GPIO, doesn't it? If someone called > > > gpiod_get_direction before it would have returned "output", too, unless > > > I miss something. > > > > > > > This commit (3edfb7bd76bd) sets the correct direction of the line by > > actually calling get_direction() instead of assuming input if > > direction_input is not NULL. It just so happened that previously the > > default direction of gpio-mockup lines was output but it would be > > displayed as input due to this inconsistency. > > Does the test that fails since 3edfb7bd76bd use debugfs/gpio to find out > the direction of a gpio? I'd say it's a bad idea to depend on this as > (AFAICT) debugfs is only a debug aid and you shouldn't depend on stuff > contained in it. > No, this is what we get from the LINEINFO ioctl(). I only use debugfs for triggering dummy interrupts. > I'd weaken the commit log a bit to not claim that the commit broke > libgpiod but that it only made the inconsistency visible. After all this > commit didn't "change the default direction of dummy lines to output", > they were an output already before. > Well it did break the tests you know. ;) I guess no harm in rewording the message. Bart