Hi Jacopo, On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:58 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:35 AM Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > VIN data groups may appear on different sets of pins, usually named > > "vinX_data_[a|b]". The existing VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() does not support > > appending the '_a' or '_b' suffix, leading to the definition of groups > > group > > > names not consistent with the ones defined using SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP() macro. > > the SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP() macro. > > > > > Fix this by adding making the VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP macro a variadic one, > > Please drop "adding". > VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() > > > which accepts an optional 'version' argument. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Perhaps it makes sense to add Fixes: 423caa52534ff15a ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a779[01]: Move 'union vin_data' to shared header file") to make sure it gets backported with the SoC-specific fixes that depend on it? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds