RE: [PATCH V4 05/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: imx7ulp: back to imx legacy binding for consistency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 5:38 PM
[...]
> 
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:13 AM A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > We already had an earlier conclusion that all new i.MX Socs will keep
> > using the legacy i.MX Pinctrl bindings instead of generic pin config.
> > However, MX7ULP generic pin config binding support has already been in
> > tree before that time. Per SoC maintainers' suggestions, in order to
> > get a better consistency for all i.MX devices, we'd like to go back to
> > imx legacy binding for MX7ULP as well.
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog:
> >  v3: new patch
> 
> Can I have some ACKs from the other Freescale people on this so I see that
> there is a wide consensus for this?
> 

You can also refer to some comments from here
https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg683812.html

Sascha & Shawn,
Would you also give a sign-offs?

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux