On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:42 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is hardly any reason to call devm_gpiochip_remove() because the > driver core handles calling gpiochip_remove() automatically. > > To make it harder to introduce new (and probably unneeded) callers, drop > the function. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied for v4.21 Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: drop devm_gpiochip_remove()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: drop devm_gpiochip_remove()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:39:10 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20181005194206.8925-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20181005194206.8925-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20181005194206.8925-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rza1: don't manually release devm managed resources
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH 2/2] gpio: drop devm_gpiochip_remove()
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rza1: don't manually release devm managed resources
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Mask read inputs for get_multiple callbacks
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: drop devm_gpiochip_remove()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: drop devm_gpiochip_remove()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rza1: don't manually release devm managed resources
- Index(es):
 |