On 10/24/18, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:34:01 +0200 > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> + >> +static void cdns_i3c_master_rd_from_rx_fifo(struct cdns_i3c_master >> *master, >> + u8 *bytes, int nbytes) >> +{ >> + readsl(master->regs + RX_FIFO, bytes, nbytes / 4); > > Vitor reported a problem with readsl(): this function expects the 2nd > argument to be aligned on 32-bit, which is not guaranteed here. Unless > you see a better solution, I'll switch back to a loop doing: > > for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) { > u32 tmp = __raw_readl(...); > memcpy(bytes + i, &tmp, > nbytes - i > 4 ? 4 : nbytes - i); > } Could we maybe mandate that the buffer itself must be aligned here? What would be a reason why we see an unaligned target buffer? The open-coded loop should generally work (maybe a little slower), but it does seem error-prone to use __raw_readl() in general. Arnd