On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:49 PM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 21:56 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > I guess I could hack to make "gpios" be ignored by the > > regulator GPIO quirks in gpiolib, but I take it you probably > > prefer to fix up the real issue like this. > > Maybe you could document in fixed-regulator bindings that it now > supports the standard "gpios" property as well? There still seems to be > a restriction that the list must contain a single element. OK you're right, fixing the docs to be more standards compliant is indeed better. > Anyway, what my patch fixes is a board-specific issue which exists even > outside your patch: the enet phy regulator never worked as expected. Indeed. Yours, Linus Walleij