Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Unify MediaTek pinctrl in preparation for MT8183 and MT6765

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 06:07:00AM -0700, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 21/09/2018 06:22, Sean Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 21:37 -0700, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:54:10AM +0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 4:07 AM <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> v2 and changes since v1:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had trouble applying the last patches in the series so I applied
> > >>>> all on an immutable branch (ib-mtk) then merged that into devel
> > >>>> and added a patch on top to fix up some GPIO includes (just sent).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please check the result!
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Sure, I'll take a look and and test on the devel branch.
> > >>>
> > >>> On the top, I'll add a fix for the issue recently reported by kbuild
> > >>> test robot about implicit declaration and a new MT6765 driver based
> > >>> on the series.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Sean,
> > >>
> > >> Do you have any plans to add support for MT6797?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > I personally have no the plan to add support to MT6797 because I have no
> > > the device, but as I knew some of people in mediatek have interest to
> > > add them by volunteers and thus there is no clear schedule. Eventually,
> > > if they're really done, they would be still based on vendor binding not
> > > by generic binding.
> > > 
> > 
> > CCing Saber as he is working on the pinctrl for this device. Actually he as some
> > questions regarding the register layout.
> > 
> > Sean maybe you can bring him in contact with someone inside Mediatek who could
> > help him :)
> >
> 
> FYI. I started working on MT6797 pinctrl support but never got time to
> finish it. You can find my initial work below. Eventhough it is based on
> the Mediatek SDK it should be fine IMO.
> 
> It would be great if someone (Saber) can took and finish it. The hard
> bit for me was lack of proper documentation :(
>

s/documentation/datasheet

> https://git.linaro.org/people/manivannan.sadhasivam/96b-common.git/log/?h=mt6797
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > Regards.
> > Matthias