On Wednesday 19 September 2018 12:56 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:13 PM Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Use dev_name to get a unique label and use -1 for a base to get our >> selection automatically. We pull in all GPIOs per chip now so this >> does not have the effect of out of order labels like before. >> >> We do these both together so we can drop all the static data in one >> patch. This also lets us normalize the return paths as we don't need >> any cleanup after this change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx> > > I have tentatively applied this patch set as we seem to have rough > consensus that it will be OK. > > We can always pull it out or revert it if things break. Okay. If that is the case then i have already tested the entire series. Apart from gpio numbering different, i have tested toggling and interrupts with k2g-evm and omapl138. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij >