On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:37 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Linus, once people are happy with these, can you maybe set up an > immutable branch with both patches in it? Sure thing, just awaiting the final ACKed version. There are some more OMAP patches floating I see, so maybe a branch with all of them on for testing purposes and coordination? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:09:10 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180911183729.17110-1-tony@atomide.com>
- References: <20180911183729.17110-1-tony@atomide.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- From: Tony Lindgren
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- From: Tony Lindgren
- [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: don't use the same irqchip with multiple gpiochips
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: wm8xxx: Cut down on boilerplate
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead
- Index(es):
 |