Re: unexpected side effect of "gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:30 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can you try this patch first?
>
> Thanks!
>
>         Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index efce534a269b..e09e4e439928 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1859,6 +1859,8 @@ static void gpiochip_set_irq_hooks(struct gpio_chip *gpiochip)
>         }
>         if (WARN_ON(gpiochip->irq.irq_enable))
>                 return;
> +       if (irqchip->irq_enable == gpiochip_irq_enable)
> +               return;

This or somthing like it (like keeping some cookie around to see
if we use the same irqchip) makes sense to me.

drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/* also use the same irqchip twice, and
I bet some more.

Looking forward to proper patch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux