On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:45 AM Richard Fitzgerald <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we are being configured via pdata we don't necessarily have > any gpio mappings being configured that way so pdata->gpio_config > could be NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied for fixes. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: madera: Fix possible NULL pointer with pdata config
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: madera: Fix possible NULL pointer with pdata config
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:03:16 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180828084537.22960-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
- References: <20180828084537.22960-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: madera: Fix possible NULL pointer with pdata config
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- [PATCH] pinctrl: madera: Fix possible NULL pointer with pdata config
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC RFT PATCH v4 1/4] gpiolib: Pass bitmaps, not integer arrays, to get/set array
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: madera: Fix possible NULL pointer with pdata config
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Add DU pins, groups and function
- Index(es):
 |