On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:10 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1309546 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357369 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357389 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:47:51 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180815171035.GA17360@embeddedor.com>
- References: <20180815171035.GA17360@embeddedor.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
- [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: rcar: Add r8a774a1 (RZ/G2M) support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] pinctrl: intel: Fix a spelling typo in kernel documentation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: 74x164: add lines-initial-states property
- Index(es):
 |