On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:09 PM zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fix the following sparse error: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c:54:16: error: return expression in void function > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied with Alban's ACK. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH linux-next] gpio: fix meaningless return expression
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] gpio: fix meaningless return expression
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 23:35:43 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1532433463-42508-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
- References: <1532433463-42508-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
- References:
- [PATCH linux-next] gpio: fix meaningless return expression
- From: zhong jiang
- [PATCH linux-next] gpio: fix meaningless return expression
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: use better errno if get_direction is not available
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: tegra: define GPIO compatible node per SoC
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH linux-next] gpio: fix meaningless return expression
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Fit writel() into a single line
- Index(es):
 |