Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900 I2C driver

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2018-07-23 05:40, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> +             /* Handle the remaining bytes which were not sent */
>> +             while (!(readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
>> +                    OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) && i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
>
> You moved the OWL_ line to the left instead of right, so this is still
> misaligned and thus not helping the reader.

Guys, wouldn't be better to


while (i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
 u32 fifostat = readl();

 if (!(fifostat & ...))
 break;
...
}

?

Same for the other branch.

Yes, it's more LOCs, but less bikeshedding,

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html