On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:00 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The pinconf_generic_dump_one() function makes the assumption that > pin_config_group_get() should return -EINVAL and -ENOTSUPP just like > pin_config_get() does. Document that so it's more obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: Document pin_config_group_get() return codes like pin_config_get()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: Document pin_config_group_get() return codes like pin_config_get()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 13:09:47 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180702225939.109169-1-dianders@chromium.org>
- References: <20180702225939.109169-1-dianders@chromium.org>
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: Document pin_config_group_get() return codes like pin_config_get()
- From: Douglas Anderson
- [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: Document pin_config_group_get() return codes like pin_config_get()
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] gpiolib-acpi: make sure we trigger edge events at least once on boot
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Join string literals back
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: msm: Fix msm_config_group_get() to be compliant
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Respect error code of ->get_direction()
- Index(es):
 |