Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semi OWL family S900 I2C driver

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 03:14:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
>> <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > +static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
>> > +                               int num)
>> > +{
>>
>> > +       int ret = 0, idx;
>>
>> Redundant assignment.
>>
>
> No. Actually the return path will be fixed in next iteration. Please
> see my reply to Peter's review for explanation.

How come? I didn't find anything related to this comment in reply you
are referring to.
I left deliberately the below part to show you the pointlessness of an
assignment to 0.

>> > +       ret = owl_i2c_hw_init(i2c_dev);
>> > +       if (ret)
>> > +               return ret;

Do you mean you are dropping this in next revision?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html