> I don't like the __namespace and this is simple enough to just > inline at all sites. Ah. Personal likes/dislikes bring to endless back and forth of code style. Acked-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 06:00:47 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20180629063544.3826-15-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- Organization: GnuDD, Device Drivers, Embedded Systems, Courses
- References: <20180629063544.3826-15-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180629063544.3826-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- References:
- [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH 01/18] gpio: rc5t583: Include the right header
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/18] gpio: sta2x11: Use BIT() macro
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: mediatek: add driver for MT7621
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 14/18] gpio: sta2x11: Use BIT() macro
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 15/18] gpio: sta2x11: Inline regs macro
- Index(es):
 |