On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Apart from the usual stuff, the debugfs code is currently also used for > one non-obvious side effect. It attempts to check whether the chip's > registers are still set to an expected value, and if not, re-initializes > them. It seems that the driver has "always" done so. > > The code, however, also checks the INTF register which normally > indicates which pins have caused the recent interrupt. That's a volatile > register, and the datasheet says that writes are ignored in there. > > When I'm just cat-ing /sys/kernel/debug/gpio with no SPI traffic and no > nosie on the GPIO lines, I'm not getting any warnings. Once I actually > use these GPIOs and cat that file in parallel, I always seem to get a: > > mcp23s08 spi1.1: restoring reg 0x07 from 0x0000 to 0xffff (power-loss?) > > This might be a sign that I should not leave my unused inputs floating, > but the code should not be checking a volatile register, anyway. Let's > simply skip this last item in the iteration. I was also considering > removing this enitre re-initialization because it's non-obvious, but the > code survived various refactorings already and has sign-offs by people > who know more than I do, so let's leave it as-is. For now :). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@xxxxxxxxx> Patch applied with Phil's review tag. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html