On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When i2c_new_dummy fails, the lack of error-handling code may > cause unexpected results. What results? Where is the analisys? Would driver work w/o these dummy devices? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:32:13 +0300
- In-reply-to: <1528774132-38287-1-git-send-email-jiazhouyang09@gmail.com>
- References: <1528774132-38287-1-git-send-email-jiazhouyang09@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
- From: Zhouyang Jia
- [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: davinci: Shuffle IRQ resource fetching from DT to beginning of probe
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add error handling for i2c_new_dummy
- Index(es):
 |