Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06/06/2018 04:18 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
---

Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk and keystone-k2g-evm boards.

  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 861f35b..375578c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_regs {
#define BINTEN 0x8 /* GPIO Interrupt Per-Bank Enable Register */
  #define MAX_LABEL_SIZE 20
+#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
static void __iomem *gpio_base;
  static unsigned int offset_array[5] = {0x10, 0x38, 0x60, 0x88, 0xb0};
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ static inline struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *irq2regs(struct irq_data *d)
  	return g;
  }
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq);
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int *bank_irq);
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -168,7 +169,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	static int ctrl_num, bank_base;
  	int gpio, bank, ret = 0;
-	unsigned ngpio, nbank, bank_irq;
+	unsigned int ngpio, nbank, nirq;
+	int bank_irq[MAX_INT_PER_BANK], i;
  	struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
  	struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -197,6 +199,16 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	if (WARN_ON(ARCH_NR_GPIOS < ngpio))
  		ngpio = ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
+ /*
+	 * If there are unbanked interrupts then the number of
+	 * interrupts is equal to number of gpios else all are banked so
+	 * number of interrupts is equal to number of banks(each with 16 gpios)
+	 */
+	if (pdata->gpio_unbanked)
+		nirq = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
+	else
+		nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
+
  	nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
  	chips = devm_kzalloc(dev,
  			     nbank * sizeof(struct davinci_gpio_controller),
@@ -209,10 +221,13 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	if (IS_ERR(gpio_base))
  		return PTR_ERR(gpio_base);
- bank_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (bank_irq < 0) {
-		dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ not populated\n");
-		return bank_irq;
+	for (i = 0; i < nirq; i++) {
+		bank_irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+		if (bank_irq[i] < 0) {
+			dev_info(dev, "IRQ not populated, err = %d\n",
+				 bank_irq[i]);
+			return bank_irq[i];
+		}
  	}
snprintf(label, MAX_LABEL_SIZE, "davinci_gpio.%d", ctrl_num++);
@@ -458,7 +473,7 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
   * (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
   */
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int *bank_irq)
  {
  	unsigned	gpio, bank;
  	int		irq;
@@ -492,6 +507,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
  		dev_err(dev, "Error %ld getting gpio clock\n", PTR_ERR(clk));
  		return PTR_ERR(clk);
  	}
+
  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;
@@ -531,12 +547,12 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
  	if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
  		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
  		chips->chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
-		chips->base_irq = bank_irq;
+		chips->base_irq = bank_irq[0];


i think, you need to update gpio_to_irq_unbanked() also, which
probably would require to save array of irqs.


and gpio_irq_type_unbanked()



[...]


--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux