2018-02-26 17:00 GMT+08:00 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > Thanks for respinning this serie. It looks mostly good, but you still > have a quite significant number of checkpatch (--strict) warnings that > you should address. Thanks for reviews :) ,i'm sorry for that, it will be fixed next time. and, besides, in what situation were the checkpatch warning can be ignore? > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 09:53:08PM +0800, hao_zhang wrote: >> +#define CAPTURE_IRQ_ENABLE_REG 0x0010 >> +#define CFIE(ch) BIT(ch << 1 + 1) >> +#define CRIE(ch) BIT(ch << 1) > > You should also put your argument between parentheses here (and in all > your other macros). Do you mean like this ? #define CFIE(ch) BIT((ch) << 1 + 1) #define CRIE(ch) BIT((ch) << 1) > >> +static const u16 div_m_table[] = { >> + 1, >> + 2, >> + 4, >> + 8, >> + 16, >> + 32, >> + 64, >> + 128, >> + 256 >> +}; > > If this is just a power of two, you can use either the power of two / > ilog2 to switch back and forth, instead of using that table. I think using table is more explicit and extended... > >> +static int sun8i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, >> + struct pwm_state *state) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + struct sun8i_pwm_chip *sun8i_pwm = to_sun8i_pwm_chip(chip); >> + struct pwm_state cstate; >> + >> + pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate); >> + if (!cstate.enabled) { >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(sun8i_pwm->clk); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to enable PWM clock\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + spin_lock(&sun8i_pwm->ctrl_lock); > > What do you need that spinlock for? Can you use a mutex instead? It should be remove. > > Thanks! > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html