On 27.04.2018 16:00, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 15:54 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> Hi Marcel, >> >> On 27.04.2018 15:33, Ziswiler wrote: >>> Hi Dmitry >>> >>> Isn't the CLK_RST_CONTROLLER_MISC_CLK_ENB_0 the other way around >>> e.g. >>> DEV1_OSC_DIV_SEL at bit 23:22 and DEV2_OSC_DIV_SEL at 21:20? >>> >>> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 02:58 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>> CDEV1/CDEV2 clocks could have corresponding oscillator clock >>>> divider >>>> as >>>> a parent. Add these dividers in order to be able to provide that >>>> parent >>>> option. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c >>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk- >>>> tegra20.c >>>> index 0ee56dd04cec..16cf4108f2ff 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c >>>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ >>>> #include "clk.h" >>>> #include "clk-id.h" >>>> >>>> +#define MISC_CLK_ENB 0x48 >>>> + >>>> #define OSC_CTRL 0x50 >>>> #define OSC_CTRL_OSC_FREQ_MASK (3<<30) >>>> #define OSC_CTRL_OSC_FREQ_13MHZ (0<<30) >>>> @@ -831,6 +833,16 @@ static void __init >>>> tegra20_periph_clk_init(void) >>>> periph_clk_enb_refcnt); >>>> clks[TEGRA20_CLK_PEX] = clk; >>>> >>>> + /* cdev1 OSC divider */ >>>> + clk_register_divider(NULL, "cdev1_osc_div", "clk_m", >>>> + 0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 20, 2, >>> >>> So it would be: >>> >>> + 0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 22, 2, >>> >>>> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL); >>>> + >>>> + /* cdev2 OSC divider */ >>>> + clk_register_divider(NULL, "cdev2_osc_div", "clk_m", >>>> + 0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 22, 2, >>> >>> And: >>> >>> + 0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 20, 2, >>> >>>> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL); >>>> + >>>> /* cdev1 */ >>>> clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "cdev1_fixed", NULL, >>>> 0, >>>> 26000000); >>>> clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_gate("cdev1", >>>> "cdev1_fixed", >>>> 0, >> >> Indeed, good catch! I'll wait for more comments and then re-spin >> patchset with >> the fix. Thank you. > > You are very welcome. Thank you! > > Other than that it all looks proper and works fine at least in the > configuration we use on Colibri T20. So you may add my reviewed and > tested bys to the whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Marcel, you previously mentioned that reverting of your DT patch works for the Colibri now. Does that reverting also work for the 4.17 kernel? If yes, I may add stable tag to the revert-patch to get back paz00 working with 4.17. If it's not working, we should figure out why pll_p_out4 is getting disabled as it should be a distinct issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html