Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Restore ULPI USB on Tegra20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:48:21AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 02:58:14AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This series of patches fixes ULPI USB on Tegra20. The original problem
> > was reported by Marcel Ziswiler, he found that "ulpi-link" clock was
> > incorrectly set to CDEV2 instead of PLL_P_OUT4. Marcel made a patch
> > that changed the "ulpi-link" clock to PLL_P_OUT4 and that fixed issue
> > with the USB for the devices that have CDEV2 being enabled by bootloader.
> > The patch got into the kernel and later Marc Dietrich found that USB
> > stopped working on the "paz00" Tegra20 board. After a bit of discussion
> > was revealed that PLL_P_OUT4 is the parent clock of the CDEV2 and clock
> > driver was setting CDEV2's parent incorrectly. The parent clock is actually
> > determined by the pinmuxing config of CDEV2 pingroup. This patchset fixes
> > the parent of CDEV2 clock by making Tegra's pinctrl driver a clock provider,
> > providing CDEV1/2 clock muxes (thanks to Peter De Schrijver for the
> > suggestion), and then setting these clock muxes as parents for the CDEV1/2
> > clocks. In the end Marcel's CDEV2->PLL_P_OUT4 change is reverted since CDEV2
> > (aka MCLK2) is the actual clock source for "ulpi-link".
> > 
> > Dmitry Osipenko (4):
> >   clk: tegra20: Add DEV1/DEV2 OSC dividers
> >   pinctrl: tegra20: Provide CDEV1/2 clock muxes
> >   clk: tegra20: Set correct parents for CDEV1/2 clocks
> >   ARM: dts: tegra20: Revert "Fix ULPI regression on Tegra20"
> > 
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi          |  2 +-
> >  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c         | 18 +++++++++++----
> >  drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.c   | 11 ---------
> >  drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra.h   | 11 +++++++++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/tegra/pinctrl-tegra20.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> Stephen, Michael, Linus,
> 
> as far as I can tell there aren't any build dependencies between the
> above, so technically these could all be merged through the individual
> trees. There's a runtime dependency from patch 2 on patch 1 and from
> patch 3 on patch 2, though I don't think they will cause any actual
> failures at runtime.
> 
> But I can also pick this up into the Tegra tree and send out pull
> requests to you for v4.18 (at around v4.17-rc6), if that's what you
> prefer.

Marc just pointed out to me on IRC that this fixes a regression that was
introduced in v4.17-rc1.

Can you guys pick this up into your -fixes branches? Again, I volunteer
to collect these into a separate branch and submit via ARM SoC (the DTS
patch is crucial in enabling the fix) with your Acked-bys if that's the
preferred option.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux