On 04/28/2018 08:40 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support >>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Biju Das <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Add PFC support for the R8A77470 SoC including pin groups for some >>>>> on-chip devices such as SCIF, AVB and MMC. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77470.c >> >>>>> +/* - AVB >>>>> +-------------------------------------------------------------------- */ static const >>>> unsigned int avb_link_pins[] = { >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 14), >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_link_mux[] = { >>>>> + AVB_LINK_MARK, >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_magic_pins[] = { >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 15), >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_magic_mux[] = { >>>>> + AVB_MAGIC_MARK, >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_phy_int_pins[] = { >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 16), >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_phy_int_mux[] = { >>>>> + AVB_PHY_INT_MARK, >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_mdio_pins[] = { >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 12), RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 13), }; static const >>>>> +unsigned int avb_mdio_mux[] = { >>>>> + AVB_MDC_MARK, AVB_MDIO_MARK, >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_mii_pins[] = { >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 14), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 15), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 16), >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 27), >>>>> + >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 2), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 3), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 4), >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 5), >>>>> + >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 10), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 0), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 1), >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 17), RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 13), RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 23), >>>>> + RCAR_GP_PIN(3, 12), >>>>> +}; >>>>> +static const unsigned int avb_mii_mux[] = { >>>>> + AVB_TXD0_MARK, AVB_TXD1_MARK, AVB_TXD2_MARK, >>>>> + AVB_TXD3_MARK, >>>>> + >>>>> + AVB_RXD0_MARK, AVB_RXD1_MARK, AVB_RXD2_MARK, >>>>> + AVB_RXD3_MARK, >>>>> + >>>>> + AVB_RX_ER_MARK, AVB_RX_CLK_MARK, AVB_RX_DV_MARK, >>>>> + AVB_CRS_MARK, AVB_TX_EN_MARK, AVB_TX_ER_MARK, >>>>> + AVB_TX_CLK_MARK, >>>> >>>> You forgot AVB_COL, which is GP5_18? >>> >>> GP5_18 is shred between the signals AVB_COL and VI0_CLK. As per the RZ/G1C board schematic /hardware user guide >>> Ethernet Phy collision pin(AVB_COL) pin is not populated on this board by default. It is populated only for >>> Video Input Channel0 pixel clock. >>> >>> Since it is initial submission, I thought of adding only board specific pins first and later >>> add this collision pin alone as a separate pin entry in the avb group. That way we can support existing board >>> as well as any future RZ/G1C board which populates this pin. Are you ok for this approach? > >> Oops. That means our grouping is suboptimal. Perhaps we should revisit >> (for all SoCs, while keeping backwards compatibility)? > > >> After reading some wikipedia, I came up with: >> >> mii_tx >> mii_tx_er (optional) >> mii_rx > > I don't see why we should have the separate TX/RX subgroups just because they're > described separately in the Wikipedia. Or did you have some special reason to do it? > >> mii_col_crs (optional, half duplex) >> >> However, given your board uses AVB_CRS without AVB_COL, that would still >> not be sufficient, so the last group should be split to cover your use case? > >> BTW, how does it work with AVB_COL not wired to anything by default, and thus >> floating? Do you enable pull-up/down for that pin in the PFC, or is the pin >> just ignored in full-duplex mode? > > Well, I'm seeing the strong possibility the half-duplex mode just doesn't work as > the collision indication isn't available. And indeed, the manuals tell me that RZ/G (and R-Car gen2) EtherAVB only supports the full-duplex mode. > [...] > >> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, >> >> Geert MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html