On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:47:01AM +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote: >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> >> + stmfxpinctrl: stmfx@42 { >> + compatible = "st,stmfx-0300"; >> + reg = <0x42>; >> + interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>; >> + interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; >> + vdd-supply = <&v3v3>; >> + status = "okay"; > > Don't show status in examples. > >> + >> + stmfxgpio: gpio { > > Why does this need to be a sub node? Are there functions beyond GPIO? Amelie can answer to whether there are, I suspect there are and in the review of patch 2 I suggest a MFD parent and parent/child spawning of a MFD child for the GPIO and pin control device. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html