Hi Andy, > Am 11.04.2018 um 07:00 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi Andy, > >> Am 10.04.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:07 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> PCAL chips ("L" seems to stand for "latched") have additional >>> registers starting at address 0x40 to control the latches, >>> interrupt mask, pull-up and pull down etc. >>> >>> The constants are so far defined in a way that they fit for >>> the pcal9555a when shifted by the number of banks, i.e. multiplied >>> by 2. >>> >>> Now the pcal6524 has 3 banks which means the relative offset >>> must be multiplied by 4 which gives a wrong result if not done >>> carefully, since the base offset is already included in the offset. >>> >>> For the basic registers shared with all pca93xx/tca64xx chips >>> there is no such offset. >>> >>> Therefore, we add code to adjust the register number for exended >>> registers to the 24 bit accessor functions. >>> >>> And we add additional register offset constants (not yet used by >>> the driver code) which are specific to the pcal6524. >>> >> >> First of all, as I said, please split this to two patches. Don't mix the things. > > Ok. Queued for v4. > >> >> >>> + /* adjust register address for pcal6524 */ >>> + if (reg >= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH) >>> + reg -= PCAL953X_OUT_STRENGTH >> 1; >>> + >> >> Give me some days to think about it. Any news on this? I am waiting for your advice before submitting v4 (with pending updates for the other patches). > No problem. I'll wait with v4. > > The only alternative I would see is to add new accessor function > pointers for the extended registers and have 0x00 based offsets, > but that is IMHO more ugly. > > BR and thanks, > Nikolaus BR and thanks, Nikolaus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html